APPENDIX G.
Reference Service Survey Report – Spring 2001
Winnie Shyam, Head of Reference

The Reference Department of Hilton C. Buley Library conducted a user satisfaction survey the week preceding Spring Break (3/10/2001-3/17/2001). The rationale for selecting this time period is that traditionally, the week prior to Spring break has always been a busy week for reference librarians. More students approach the reference desk for assistance with class assignments or term papers during this time. The following is a brief descriptive report of the survey.

Procedure:  The survey began on a Saturday and continued through the following Friday. During the sample period, each user approaching the reference staff with a reference question was asked to help improve reference service by filling out a brief questionnaire pertaining to reference service and reference collections.  Two boxes were placed at different spots in the reference area for completed surveys.  Patrons were reminded to place their surveys in these boxes before leaving the library. Most users took the time to fill the surveys; very few did not return them.

Data Analysis: A total of 77 responses were collected. Of these, 49.3% were undergraduates and 40.3% were graduates.  2.6% were faculty and the remaining were users from the community.  More than half of those surveyed were female (56%). 58.5% of the users surveyed were between 17 and 30 years.  29.8% were between 31 and 50 years. The remaining were 51 or above. Users were asked to rate the quality of service provided by the reference librarians, the print reference collection, and the electronic reference sources.  The choices provided to them were not satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied, and no opinion. 

Based on the responses of the surveys in conjunction with the comments, the following conclusions were drawn:

  1. Overall the students were very pleased with the reference desk staff. 74% were very satisfied and 26% were satisfied. Most of them thought it was a very worthwhile and much needed service and the comments were very positive. They found the reference librarians to be very knowledgeable, courteous, friendly, helpful and service-oriented. There was a suggestion to have more staff at the reference desk so patrons do not have to wait long for help. 

  2. Most users (38%) were satisfied with the print reference collection and 28% were very satisfied.  The remaining had not really used the print reference sources and therefore had no opinion.

  3. 32% were satisfied with the number of online databases and 42% were very satisfied with the electronic reference products. 3% had no opinion.  It was evident that while most users are very happy with the number and choice of online databases available to them, accessing these databases from off-campus was a source of frustration for some. Others would like to see more printers in the reference area. Lack of adequate printers to support the heavy use of the computers in reference generated a few complaints.

Future Assessment Plans: The Reference Department will conduct surveys regularly. The surveys will be conducted for a longer period of time.  Some of the questions will address librarians’ attitudes toward patron, satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the sources recommended by the librarian as well as the quality of the bibliographic instruction program. The Reference collection and the bibliographic instruction program have grown rapidly over the past year and these changes can be better perceived over time.  It is our hope, therefore, that future surveys will bring even better results.

Reference Services User Survey Spring 2001

Total Number of Responses77
Duration of Survey: 3/10-3/16  (1 week)
Survey Method: Survey was handed to anyone approaching the Reference Desk for help

1. Are you: ____ undergraduate ____  graduate _____ faculty _____ other?

38 (49.3%) undergraduate
31 (40.3%)  graduate
2 (2.6%)  faculty
6 (7.8%) other

2. Are you:  _____ male_____ female

19  (24.7%)  male 
56  (72.7%) female
2    (2.6 %) no answer

3. Age (Optional)

(1.3%)  under 17 yrs.
(31.2%) 17-22 yrs.
(27.3%)  23-30 yrs.
(16.9%)   30-40 yrs.
(12.9%)  40-50 yrs.
(7.8%)      51 or above
(2.6%)   no answer

4. How satisfied are you with the service provided by the reference librarians?
____ not satisfied ____ satisfied _____ very satisfied _____ no opinion

(0%)  not satisfied  
(26%)  satisfied
(74%) very satisfied
(0%)  no opinion

5. How satisfied are you with the print reference collection?
____ not satisfied ____ satisfied ____ very satisfied ____ no opinion

(2.6%) not satisfied
(44.1%) satisfied
(36.4%) very satisfied
(16.9%) no opinion

6. How satisfied are you with the electronic reference sources (online databases)?
____  not satisfied ____ satisfied ____ very satisfied ____ no opinion

(0%) not satisfied
(41.6%)  satisfied
(54.5%)   very satisfied
(3.9%)  no opinion

7. Would you approach the reference desk for help again?
_____ no _____ yes _____ unsure    

(0%) No
(100%) Yes
(0%)  Unsure  

8. Additional Comments: